Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: BWh migrate: Mp phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: THp food: biCi, biHl class:
MRE = 0.057 habitat: 0iFr, 0iFl gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.007 embryo: Fs, Fh reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 13 12.62 (0.02928) d age at birth guess
am 5475 5441 (0.006145) d life span guess
Lp 11.4 9.585 (0.1592) cm total length at puberty fishbase
Li 29 24.93 (0.1404) cm ultimate total length fishbase
Wwb 0.0009 0.0009132 (0.01464) g wet weight at birth UlnuBlaci1994
Wwp 13 13.54 (0.04153) g wet weight at puberty\ fishbase
Wwi 226.5 238.2 (0.05159) g ultimate wet weight fishbase

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
LN fork length fecundity (0.1732) UlnuBlaci1994
LW fork length weight (0.1052) UlnuBlaci1994
tL_fm time since birth fork length (0.04882) UlnuBlaci1994
tW_fm time since birth weight (0.05369) UlnuBlaci1994

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Acanthobrama marmid Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02545 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 31.68 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.001736 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.2862 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.9058 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8012 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • Males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} only

Facts

  • Length-weight: Ww (in g) = 0.00759*(TL in cm)^3.06 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation