Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: std climate: MA migrate: Mo phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MI, MPW food: biCi, biPz class:
MRE = 0.102 habitat: biMr gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.019 embryo: Mc reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 4.5 4.288 (0.04703) d age at birth guess
am 380 380 (4.632e-06) d life span HernMund2005
Lp 4.87 5.246 (0.07715) cm total length at puberty HernMund2005a
Lim 10 11.55 (0.1546) cm ultimate total length for males fishbase
Wwb 0.0002771 0.0002815 (0.01601) g wet weight at birth guess
Wwp 1.09 1.063 (0.02436) g wet weight at puberty fishbase
Wwi 10 10.08 (0.00753) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Ri 38.36 38.34 (0.0005306) #/d maximum reprod rate guess

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_f Data for females, males time since birth total length (0.1007) HernMund2005
tL_m Data for females, males time since birth total length (0.181) HernMund2005

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Amblygobius bynoensis Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02081 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 55.38 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.1884 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.9 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8019 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • males are supposed to differ from females by {p_Am} only

Facts

  • length-weight: weight in g = 0.00832*(TL in cm)^3.08 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation