Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MC migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MPN food: biCi class:
MRE = 0.062 habitat: 0iMcd gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.008 embryo: Mp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 14.5 16.98 (0.171) d age at birth ClarJens1999, AldeJens1988
am 3.431e+04 3.782e+04 (0.1022) d life span fishbase
Lp 60.5 62.14 (0.02708) cm total length at puberty for female fishbase
Li 120 122.4 (0.02024) cm ultimate total length for female fishbase
Wwb 0.0046 0.004257 (0.07465) g wet weight at birth ClarJens1999
Wwp 2300 2292 (0.003373) g wet weight at puberty fishbase
Wwi 1.77e+04 1.753e+04 (0.009485) g ultimate wet weight for female fishbase
Ri 2740 2650 (0.03268) #/d max reprod rate fishbase

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL time since birth total length (0.1073) HeadKell2014

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Anoplopoma fimbria Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02482 cm/d energy conductance
kap 0.8 0.7337 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency
p_M 18 9882 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
kap_G 0.8 0.81 - growth efficiency

Discussion

  • Males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} only
  • abj has been applied since related species show acceleration; foetal development was ignored because of absence of its combination with abj. The effect is probably very small.
  • mod_1: p_M is reduced

Facts

  • legnth-weight: Ww in g =0.01122*(TL in cm)^2.98 (Ref: fishbase)

Acknowledgment

  • The creation of this entry was supported by the Norwegian Science Council (NFR 255295)

Bibliography

Citation