Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MB migrate: Mo phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MAE food: bjPz, jiCi class:
MRE = 0.044 habitat: 0iMp gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.003 embryo: Mp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 4 4.158 (0.03942) d age at birth LikaKooy2014
am 1.095e+04 1.047e+04 (0.04392) d life span fishbase
Lp 75.4 73.07 (0.03093) cm total length at puberty Smal1985
Li 200 199.3 (0.003668) cm ultimate total length fishbase
Wwb 0.00037 0.000417 (0.127) g wet weight at birth guess
Wwp 3100 3186 (0.02773) g wet weight at puberty Smal1985, fishbase
Wwi 6.18e+04 6.462e+04 (0.04564) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
GSI 0.06 0.06963 (0.1605) - gonado-somatic index Smal1985

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tLW time since birth total length
weight
(0.0362) WallSchl1979

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Argyrosomus hololepidotus Unit Description
v 0.02 0.06376 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 3.709 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.0002496 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.3524 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.8531 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.7992 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • males are supposed not to differ from females

Facts

  • weight-length relationship: W in g = 0.00562*(TL in cm)^3.06 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation