Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MA migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MPE food: biO class:
MRE = 0.056 habitat: 0iMcd gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.005 embryo: Mbf reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
am 2920 2947 (0.009123) d life span Warb1978
Lp 18.5 17.51 (0.05366) cm total length at puberty Warb1978
Li 54 54.32 (0.005998) cm ultimate total length fishbase
Wwb 2.145 2.016 (0.05996) g wet weight at birth smithonian
Wwp 54.4 54.98 (0.01069) g wet weight at puberty Warb1978, fishbase
Wwi 1500 1643 (0.09507) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Ri 0.1781 0.1624 (0.08809) #/d maximum reprod rate guess

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL time since birth fork length (0.08873) Warb1978

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Ariopsis guatemalensis Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02192 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 35.07 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002082 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.3093 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.9515 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8033 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • Males are assumed not to differ from females
  • I had to subtract 1 yr from age-estimates in tL data to arrive at a reasonable fit

Facts

  • length-weight: W in g = 0.00661*(TL in cm)^3.09 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation