Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: Aw migrate: Mp phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: TPa food: biCi, biCvf class:
MRE = 0.076 habitat: biFr gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.016 embryo: Fnfm reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 11.5 12.78 (0.1116) d age at birth guess
am 2555 2554 (0.0003808) d life span guess
Lp 22.7 21.1 (0.07058) cm total length at puberty fishbase
Li 127 117.9 (0.07156) cm ultimate total length fishbase
Wwb 0.001 0.0009947 (0.005275) g wet weight at birth AnjaDade2009
Wwp 200 204.4 (0.02214) g wet weight at puberty fishbase
Wwi 3.5e+04 3.569e+04 (0.01962) g ultimate wet weight fishbase

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
LN total length fecundity (0.2675) AnjaDade2009
LW fork length weight (0.1199) Khal1988
tL time since birth total length (0.08254) Khal1988

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Bagrus docmak Unit Description
v 0.02 0.0182 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 11.77 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.8904 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.9718 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.7986 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • males are assumed not to differ from females

Facts

  • length-weight: Ww in g = 0.00933*(TL in cm)^3.00 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation