Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: std climate: A, B migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.8 ecozone: TPi, TA food: biTim, biCim class:
MRE = 0.084 habitat: 0iFm gender: Hsm order:
SMSE = 0.016 embryo: Fs reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ah 2 1.997 (0.001266) d age at hatch GoveBain2003
ab 27 25.74 (0.04665) d age at birth GoveBain2003
tp 107 107.6 (0.005829) d time since birth at puberty GoveBain2003
am 152.5 153.2 (0.004697) d life span GoveBain2003
L2b 0.045 0.03523 (0.2172) cm^2 surface at birth GoveBain2003
L2p 0.477 0.5202 (0.09063) cm^2 surface at puberty GoveBain2003
L2i 0.479 0.5279 (0.102) cm^2 ultimate surface GoveBain2003
Wwb 0.0012 0.001434 (0.1946) g wet weight at birth GoveBain2003
Wwp 0.089 0.08135 (0.08591) g wet weight at puberty GoveBain2003
Wwi 0.091 0.08315 (0.08621) g ultimate wet weight GoveBain2003
Ri 0.4286 0.429 (0.001083) #/d maximum reprod rate GoveBain2003

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL2 age surface (0.1669) GoveBain2003

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Barbronia weberi Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02332 cm/d energy conductance
kap 0.8 0.6397 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency
p_M 18 4050 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
kap_G 0.8 0.7992 - growth efficiency

Discussion

  • Energy conductance seems to make a jump upwards at birth, which is taken into account

Bibliography

Citation