Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: std climate: BW migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: THp food: biPz, biCi class:
MRE = 0.064 habitat: 0jFr, jiFl gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.009 embryo: Fg reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 50 50.53 (0.01056) d age at birth fishbase
am 3650 3650 (0.0001075) d life span TsogMend2017
Lp 30 32.24 (0.07473) cm total length at puberty guess
Li 70 71.07 (0.01521) cm ultimate total length fishbase
Wwb 0.0048 0.004792 (0.001672) g wet weight at birth guess
Wwp 312 304.7 (0.02355) g wet weight at puberty fishbase, guess
Wwi 4.2e+04 3262 (0.9223) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Ri 13.7 13.72 (0.00148) #/d max reoduction rate fishbase

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_f Data for females, males time since birth total length (0.07882) TsogMend2017
tL_m Data for females, males time since birth total length (0.1098) TsogMend2017
LWw total length wet weight (0.08922) TsogMend2017

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Brachymystax lenok Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02546 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 21.54 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.4854 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.9517 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8004 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • Males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} only
  • Data Wwi is ignorned due to incinsistency with LW data

Facts

  • length-weight: W in g = 0.00912*(TL in cm)^3.07 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation