Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: B, C migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.3 ecozone: THn food: biPp, biD class:
MRE = 0.025 habitat: 0iFpe gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.001 embryo: Fbf reprod: Apf family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 0.8 1.289 (0.6116) d age at birth guess
tp 7.5 7.57 (0.009391) d time since birth at puberty MeadObre1995
am 25 25.02 (0.0006203) d life span guess
Lb 0.04 0.09483 (1.371) cm total length at birth guess
Lp 0.9 0.8893 (0.01187) cm total length at puberty MeadObre1995
Li 1.3 1.321 (0.01653) cm ultimate total length MeadObre1995
Wwb 9.2e-06 8.838e-06 (0.03936) g wet weight at birth Belk1977
Wdi 0.0037 0.004065 (0.09877) g ultimate dry weight guess
Ri 100 90.17 (0.0983) #/d maximum reprod rate guess
sM 5 5.459 (0.09181) - acceleration factor guess

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_fm time since birth length (0.01123) MeadObre1995

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Branchinecta lindahli Unit Description
v 0.02 0.0363 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 7330 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.00121 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.9339 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8018 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • males are supposed to differ from females by {p_Am} only

Bibliography

Citation