Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MB, MC migrate: Mo phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.3 ecozone: MAE, MAm food: bjPz, jiCi class:
MRE = 0.025 habitat: 0jMp, jiMcd gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.002 embryo: Mp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
am 4745 4746 (0.0001643) d life span fishbase
Lp 8 7.975 (0.003139) cm total length at puberty Deni1990
Li 11.7 11.72 (0.001911) cm ultimate total length for females Deni1990
Lim 9.8 10.94 (0.1164) cm ultimate total length for males Deni1990
Wwb 0.00018 0.0001797 (0.001861) g wet weight at birth CastEdwa2017
Wwp 4.6 4.614 (0.003055) g wet weight at puberty Deni1990, fishbase
Wwi 14.6 14.65 (0.003694) g ultimate wet weight Deni1990, fishbase
Ri 82.19 81.67 (0.006312) #/d max reprod rate guess

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_f Data for females, males time since birth total length (0.05334) Deni1990
tL_m Data for females, males time since birth total length (0.06146) Deni1990

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Buglossidium luteum Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02247 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 54.58 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.1911 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.6471 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8021 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • Males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} and E_Hp only
  • mod_1: males have equal state variables at b, compared to females

Facts

  • Preferred temperature 10.6 C (Ref: fishbase)
  • Length-Weight relationship: Ww in g = 0.00871*(TL in cm)^3.02 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation