Predictions & Data for this entry
| Model: abj | climate: BSk, BWk | migrate: Mp | phylum: |
| COMPLETE = 2.5 | ecozone: THp | food: biCi, biHl, biD | class: |
| MRE = 0.061 | habitat: 0iFp, 0iFm, 0iFl | gender: D | order: |
| SMSE = 0.012 | embryo: Fh | reprod: O | family: |
Zero-variate data
| Data | Observed | Predicted | (RE) | Unit | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| am | 4380 | 4445 | (0.01477) | d | life span | TurkErdo2002 |
| Lp | 20.9 | 19.55 | (0.0645) | cm | fork length at puberty for females | TurkErdo2002 |
| Lpm | 16.9 | 16.18 | (0.04289) | cm | fork length at puberty for males | TurkErdo2002 |
| Li | 46.7 | 48.66 | (0.04197) | cm | ultimate fork length | fishbase |
| Wwb | 0.0026 | 0.002494 | (0.04086) | g | wet weight at birth | TurkErdo2002 |
| Ri | 98.24 | 96.36 | (0.01916) | #/d | reprod rate for FL 40.2 cm | TurkErdo2002 |
Uni- and bivariate data
| Data | Figure | Independent variable | Dependent variable | (RE) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| tL_f |   | time since birth | fork length | (0.06107) | TurkErdo2002 |
| tL_m | | time since birth | fork length | (0.08237) | TurkErdo2002 |
| tW_f |   | time since birth | wet weight | (0.07902) | TurkErdo2002 |
| tW_m | | time since birth | wet weight | (0.07964) | TurkErdo2002 |
Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C
| Data | Generalised animal | Capoeta capoeta | Unit | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| v | 0.02 | 0.02402 | cm/d | energy conductance |
| p_M | 18 | 73.31 | J/d.cm^3 | vol-spec som maint |
| k_J | 0.002 | 0.002 | 1/d | maturity maint rate coefficient |
| k | 0.3 | 0.1424 | - | maintenance ratio |
| kap | 0.8 | 0.8991 | - | allocation fraction to soma |
| kap_G | 0.8 | 0.8018 | - | growth efficiency |
| kap_R | 0.95 | 0.95 | - | reproduction efficiency |
Discussion
- Males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} and E_Hp only
- tL and tW data suggests an increasing food density, which is taken into account
- mod_1: males have equal state variables at b, compared to females
Bibliography