Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: Cfb, Dfb migrate: Mp phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: THp food: biCi, biHl, biD class:
MRE = 0.136 habitat: 0iFp, 0iFm, 0iFl gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.076 embryo: Fh reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
tp 1642 1540 (0.0624) d age at puberty for females Wijm2009
tpm 1460 1436 (0.01641) d age at puberty for males Wijm2009
am 3650 3718 (0.01858) d life span Wijm2009
Lh 0.5 0.173 (0.654) cm total length at hatch Wijm2009
Lb 0.725 0.1767 (0.7562) cm total length at birth Wijm2009
Li 50 62.4 (0.248) cm ultimate total length Wijm2009
Wwb 0.00052 0.0004986 (0.04121) g wet weight at birth Wijm2009
Ri 1370 1148 (0.1617) #/d max reprod rate Wijm2009

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
Tah temperature age at hatch (0.1339) Wijm2009
tL time since birth total length (0.05899) Wijm2009
tW time since birth wet weight (0.1258) Wijm2009

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Carassius carassius Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02888 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 37.04 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.2789 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.9781 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8099 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • Males are assumed to differ from females by E_Hp only
  • The high maintenance, compared to other family members, is probably linked to farming selection, to boost production

Bibliography

Citation