Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: stf climate: MB migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MC food: biCi, biCvf class:
MRE = 0.040 habitat: 0iMcp gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.003 embryo: Mv reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 579.5 574.9 (0.007943) d age at birth guess
am 9125 9125 (5.41e-06) d life span ADW
Lb 65.5 64.18 (0.02015) cm total length at birth ADW
Lp 175 174.8 (0.001284) cm total length at puberty for females ADW
Lpm 170 166.8 (0.01884) cm total length at puberty for males ADW
Li 300 293 (0.02333) cm ultimate total length for females fishbase
Lim 280 278.8 (0.004269) cm ultimate total length for males guess
Wwi 2.087e+05 2.132e+05 (0.02172) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Ri 0.01507 0.01456 (0.03372) #/d maximum reprod rate ADW

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_f Data for females, males time since birth total length (0.07117) SmarChin2017
tL_m Data for females, males time since birth total length (0.06033) SmarChin2017

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Carcharhinus albimarginatus Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02 cm/d energy conductance
kap 0.8 0.5797 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency
p_M 18 7.906 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.0004459 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
kap_G 0.8 0.7987 - growth efficiency
k 0.3 0.2954 - maintenance ratio

Discussion

  • Males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} only
  • temperatures are guessed
  • The little curvature in tL data gives parameter estimation problems
  • mod_1: males have equal state variables at b, compared to females

Facts

  • length-weight: 0.00437*(TL in cm)^3.10 (Ref: fishbase)
  • Preferred temp 27 C,usually 20 - 65 m deep (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation