Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: std climate: MB migrate: Mo phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MPW food: bjPz, jiCi, jiCvf class:
MRE = 0.015 habitat: 0jMp, jiMpb gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.001 embryo: Mp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
am 2.518e+04 2.518e+04 (0.0001525) d life span fishbase
Lp 22.5 22.54 (0.001774) cm total length at puberty fishbase
Li 51 51.6 (0.01176) cm ultimate total length fishbase
Wwb 0.0007 0.0006989 (0.001561) g wet weight at birth LeisCars2000
Wwp 162.4 162.3 (0.0006381) g wet weight at puberty fishbase
Wwi 1950 1947 (0.001462) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Ri 712.3 711.1 (0.001746) #/d maximum reprod rate guess

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_fm time since birth fork length (0.03255) MoriRowl2001

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Centroberyx affinis Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02242 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 21.71 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.4815 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.7416 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8006 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} only
  • I had to add 1 yr to age estimates in tL data to arrive at a good fit

Facts

  • length-weight: W in g = 0.01259*(TL in cm)^3.04 (Ref: fishbase)
  • from photo: TL = 1.16 * FL (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation