Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: std climate: Aw, BSh, Cfa migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.3 ecozone: TN food: 0iCi class:
MRE = 0.031 habitat: 0jFp, jiTf gender: Dg order:
SMSE = 0.002 embryo: Fpf reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
am 3650 3650 (1.416e-05) d life span Wiki
Lp 6 6 (5.561e-05) cm SVL at puberty for females guess
Li 13 12.29 (0.05443) cm ultimate SVL for females Wiki
Lim 10.8 11.42 (0.05749) cm ultimate SVL for males guess
Wwb 0.0049 0.004901 (0.0002852) g wet weight at birth OrtiAlme2013
Wwj 5.727 5.574 (0.0267) g wet weight at metam GrayCook2005
Wwi 500 509.9 (0.01978) g ultimate wet weight for females Wiki
Wwim 387 381.5 (0.0141) g ultimate wet weight for males guess
Ri 21.92 21.94 (0.0009608) #/d maximum reprod rate guess

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tW time since metam wet weight (0.0651) GrayCook2005

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Ceratophrys cranwelli Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02311 cm/d energy conductance
kap 0.8 0.9796 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency
p_M 18 832.9 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
kap_G 0.8 0.8 - growth efficiency

Discussion

  • males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} only
  • this data determines [p_M] poorly

Facts

  • Males dig a burrow and make foam nest in it (Ref: Wiki)

Bibliography

Citation