Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: std climate: C, D migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.3 ecozone: TH, TP, TN food: biPp, biD class:
MRE = 0.094 habitat: 0iFp, 0iFl, 0iFm gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.025 embryo: Fbf reprod: Apf family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 0.6667 0.5758 (0.1363) d age at birth GansLeit2013
tp 2 1.882 (0.05912) d time since birth at puberty GansLeit2013
am 40 39.99 (0.0001262) d life span guess
Lb 0.038 0.03167 (0.1666) cm total length at birth GansLeit2013
Lp 0.069 0.06883 (0.002534) cm total length at puberty Burg1967
Li 0.17 0.1768 (0.04011) cm ultimate total length nina
Lim 0.08 0.08003 (0.000327) cm ultimate total length of males nina
Wdi 3.47e-05 3.446e-05 (0.006998) g ultimate dry weight guess

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
LN length fecundity (0.2308) Burg1967
tL time since birth length (0.03269) GansLeit2013

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Ceriodaphnia reticulata Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02413 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 1680 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.005286 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.4251 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8012 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} only

Bibliography

Citation