Predictions & Data for this entry
Model: std | climate: MC | migrate: Mo | phylum: |
COMPLETE = 2.5 | ecozone: MC | food: biP | class: |
MRE = 0.057 | habitat: 0iMcp | gender: D | order: |
SMSE = 0.008 | embryo: Mv | reprod: O | family: |
Zero-variate data
Data | Observed | Predicted | (RE) | Unit | Description | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ab | 1278 | 1255 | (0.01745) | d | age at birth | fao |
tp | 7300 | 9519 | (0.304) | d | time since birth at puberty | fishbase |
am | 1.825e+04 | 1.8e+04 | (0.01359) | d | life span | Wiki |
Lb | 165 | 167 | (0.01189) | cm | total length at birth | fao |
Lp | 810 | 791.4 | (0.02301) | cm | total length at puberty for females | fishbase |
Lpm | 450 | 427.3 | (0.05039) | cm | total length at puberty for males | fao |
Li | 980 | 1068 | (0.08931) | cm | ultimate total length for females | fishbase |
Lim | 1520 | 1447 | (0.04773) | cm | ultimate total length for males | fishbase |
Wwp | 2.625e+06 | 2.132e+06 | (0.188) | g | wet weight at puberty for females | fao, fishbase |
Wwpm | 4.5e+05 | 4.507e+05 | (0.001447) | g | wet weight at puberty for males | fao, fishbase |
Wwi | 4.65e+06 | 5.232e+06 | (0.1253) | g | ultimate wet weight | fishbase |
Wwim | 1.73e+07 | 1.751e+07 | (0.01232) | g | ultimate wet weight | fishbase |
Ri | 0.00411 | 0.004021 | (0.02151) | #/d | maximum reprod rate | Wiki |
Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C
Data | Generalised animal | Cetorhinus maximus | Unit | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|
v | 0.02 | 0.05099 | cm/d | energy conductance |
kap | 0.8 | 0.9244 | - | allocation fraction to soma |
kap_R | 0.95 | 0.95 | - | reproduction efficiency |
p_M | 18 | 97.53 | J/d.cm^3 | vol-spec som maint |
k_J | 0.002 | 0.002 | 1/d | maturity maint rate coefficient |
kap_G | 0.8 | 0.8019 | - | growth efficiency |
Discussion
- Males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} and E_Hp only
- Almost all data are rather uncertain
Facts
- length - weight: Ww in g = 4.94e-3*(TL in cm)^3 (Ref: fishbase)
- Ovoviviparous and oophagous; only right ovary is in function (Ref: Wiki)
- Aging by counting rings in vertebrae is unreliable (Ref: NataWint2008, fao)
Bibliography