Predictions & Data for this entry
| Model: abj | climate: MA | migrate: Ma | phylum: |
| COMPLETE = 2.5 | ecozone: MIE, MPW | food: biPz, jiCvf | class: |
| MRE = 0.052 | habitat: 0iMpe | gender: D | order: |
| SMSE = 0.006 | embryo: Mpe | reprod: O | family: |
Zero-variate data
| Data | Observed | Predicted | (RE) | Unit | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ab | 2 | 2.072 | (0.03607) | d | age at birth | Dels1930 |
| ap | 305 | 300.9 | (0.01344) | d | age at puberty | AbduPill2011 |
| am | 4745 | 4775 | (0.006275) | d | life span | fishbase |
| Lb | 0.68 | 0.5798 | (0.1474) | cm | total length at birth | Dels1930, Rich2008 |
| Lp | 49.2 | 48.24 | (0.01945) | cm | total length at puberty for female | AbduPill2011 |
| Lpm | 48.6 | 47.36 | (0.02547) | cm | total length at puberty for male | AbduPill2011 |
| Li | 100 | 124.3 | (0.2433) | cm | ultimate total length | ADW |
| Lim | 100 | 102.6 | (0.02586) | cm | ultimate total length | ADW |
| Wwi | 1200 | 1125 | (0.06263) | g | ultimate wet weight | ADW |
| Ri | 165.1 | 158.9 | (0.03741) | #/d | reprod rate at TL 58.7 cm | AbduPill2011 |
Uni- and bivariate data
| Data | Figure | Independent variable | Dependent variable | (RE) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| tL |  | time since birth | total length | (0.01894) | AbduPill2011 |
Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C
| Data | Generalised animal | Chirocentrus dorab | Unit | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| v | 0.02 | 0.02753 | cm/d | energy conductance |
| p_M | 18 | 31.91 | J/d.cm^3 | vol-spec som maint |
| k_J | 0.002 | 0.001697 | 1/d | maturity maint rate coefficient |
| k | 0.3 | 0.2774 | - | maintenance ratio |
| kap | 0.8 | 0.9742 | - | allocation fraction to soma |
| kap_G | 0.8 | 0.802 | - | growth efficiency |
| kap_R | 0.95 | 0.95 | - | reproduction efficiency |
Discussion
- males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} and E_Hp only
- incubation time is ignored; weight could not be found
- mod_2: males have equal state variables at b, compared to females
- mod_3: tL data replaced, because the previous data of Luth1985 wrongly implies a growth rate that was much too slow
Bibliography