Predictions & Data for this entry
| Model: std | climate: A | migrate: | phylum: |
| COMPLETE = 2.5 | ecozone: TN | food: biCi, biHs | class: |
| MRE = 0.037 | habitat: 0iTf | gender: Dg | order: |
| SMSE = 0.002 | embryo: Tnpf | reprod: O | family: |
Zero-variate data
| Data | Observed | Predicted | (RE) | Unit | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ab | 17 | 18.99 | (0.1173) | d | age at birth | SancLond2016 |
| tx | 23 | 23.13 | (0.005498) | d | time since birth at fledging | LoaiMosq2017 |
| tp | 69 | 66.39 | (0.03785) | d | time since birth at puberty | guess |
| tR | 365 | 366.4 | (0.003902) | d | time since birth at 1st brood | guess |
| am | 5475 | 5459 | (0.002879) | d | life span | guess |
| Wwb | 2.3 | 2.225 | (0.0326) | g | wet weight at birth | LoaiMosq2017 |
| Wwi | 13.3 | 13.9 | (0.04517) | g | ultimate wet weight | LoaiMosq2017 |
| Ri | 0.00274 | 0.00264 | (0.03642) | #/d | maximum reprod rate | LoaiMosq2017 |
Uni- and bivariate data
| Data | Figure | Independent variable | Dependent variable | (RE) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| tW |  | time since birth | wet weight | (0.04647) | LoaiMosq2017 |
Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C
| Data | Generalised animal | Chlorochrysa nitidissima | Unit | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| v | 0.02 | 0.02737 | cm/d | energy conductance |
| p_M | 18 | 602.6 | J/d.cm^3 | vol-spec som maint |
| k_J | 0.002 | 0.02652 | 1/d | maturity maint rate coefficient |
| k | 0.3 | 0.3216 | - | maintenance ratio |
| kap | 0.8 | 0.9381 | - | allocation fraction to soma |
| kap_G | 0.8 | 0.8014 | - | growth efficiency |
| kap_R | 0.95 | 0.95 | - | reproduction efficiency |
Discussion
- Body temperatures are guessed
- mod_1: v is reduced, food availability taken variable in tW data
- mod_2: Pseudo-data point k is used, rather than k_J; Data set tp and parameter t_R are added, the latter replacing clutch interval t_N. Postnatal T is based on PrinPres1991, see get_T_Aves. See further the revision page, theme puberty
Bibliography