Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: Cfa migrate: Mp phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: THn food: biCi, biHl, biD class:
MRE = 0.059 habitat: 0iFp, 0iFm, 0iFl gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.007 embryo: Fh reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
am 1460 1454 (0.003789) d life span fishbase
Lp 4.2 4.179 (0.005084) cm total length at puberty StarStar1981
Li 7.6 7.784 (0.02422) cm ultimate total length fishbase
Wwb 0.0013 0.001216 (0.06473) g wet weight at birth StarStar1981
Wwp 0.59 0.5846 (0.009075) g wet weight at puberty fishbase, StarStar1981
Wwi 3.5 3.779 (0.07978) g ultimate wet weight StarStar1981
Ri 7.868 7.417 (0.05732) #/d max reproduction rate StarStar1981

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
LW_f Data for females, males total length weight (0.08514) StarStar1981
LW_m Data for females, males total length weight (0.08438) StarStar1981
tL time since birth total length (0.09943) StarStar1981

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Chrosomus cumberlandensis Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02094 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 34.56 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.3017 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.4634 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8024 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • Males are assumed to not differ from females

Facts

  • length-weight Ww in g = 0.00389*(TL in cm)^3.12 (Ref: fishbase)
  • length - length from photo: SL = 0.84 * TL (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation