Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MC migrate: Mo phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MANE food: biHa, biCiw, biCim, biCid, biCik, biCvf class:
MRE = 0.048 habitat: jiMi, 0jMcp gender: Dg order:
SMSE = 0.004 embryo: Mp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
am 1460 1452 (0.00568) d life span ClarGard1977
Lp 6.2 5.99 (0.03384) cm length at puberty fishbase
Li 20 20.04 (0.001799) cm ultimate length fishbase
Wwb 0.0003 0.0003011 (0.003798) g wet weight at birth ClarGard1977
Wwp 1 1.014 (0.01382) g wet weight at puberty fishbase
Wwi 38.6 37.94 (0.01715) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
GSI 0.1 0.09969 (0.003142) - gonado somatic index ClarGard1977

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_fm time length (0.07382) ClarGard1977

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Ciliata septentrionalis Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02006 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 22.14 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.4727 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.872 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.7995 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • males are supposed to differ from females by {p_Am} only
  • I had to add 1 yr to tL data to arrive at a natural fit

Bibliography

Citation