Predictions & Data for this entry
| Model: abj | climate: Dwa | migrate: Mda | phylum: |
| COMPLETE = 2.5 | ecozone: THp | food: biPz | class: |
| MRE = 0.031 | habitat: 0iFl | gender: D | order: |
| SMSE = 0.001 | embryo: Fg, Fs | reprod: O | family: |
Zero-variate data
| Data | Observed | Predicted | (RE) | Unit | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| am | 5110 | 5403 | (0.0574) | d | life span | guess |
| Lp | 20 | 19.85 | (0.007547) | cm | total length at puberty for females | guess |
| Li | 30 | 30.92 | (0.03055) | cm | ultimate total length | fishbase |
| Wwb | 0.0018 | 0.001719 | (0.04482) | g | wet weight at birth | guess |
| Wwp | 65 | 64.16 | (0.01288) | g | wet weight at puberty | fishbase |
| Wwi | 238 | 242.5 | (0.01873) | g | ultimate wet weight | fishbase |
| Ri | 2.638 | 2.567 | (0.02695) | #/d | max reprod rate | guess |
Uni- and bivariate data
| Data | Figure | Independent variable | Dependent variable | (RE) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| tW |   | time since birth | weight | (0.03519) | BaerGeis2017 |
Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C
| Data | Generalised animal | Coregonus macrophthalmus | Unit | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| v | 0.02 | 0.02423 | cm/d | energy conductance |
| p_M | 18 | 77.81 | J/d.cm^3 | vol-spec som maint |
| k_J | 0.002 | 0.002 | 1/d | maturity maint rate coefficient |
| k | 0.3 | 0.1338 | - | maintenance ratio |
| kap | 0.8 | 0.9904 | - | allocation fraction to soma |
| kap_G | 0.8 | 0.8036 | - | growth efficiency |
| kap_R | 0.95 | 0.95 | - | reproduction efficiency |
Discussion
- Males are supposed not to differ from females
Facts
- length-weight relationship: Ww in g = 0.00447*(TL in cm)^3.20 (Ref: fishbase)
- endemic to Lake Constance (Ref: fishbase)
Bibliography