Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: Cfa, Dfa migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.6 ecozone: THn food: bjTvf, jiPp class:
MRE = 0.113 habitat: 0iFr, 0iFp gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.027 embryo: Fbb reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 10 3.806 (0.6194) d age at birth unio
am 2.044e+04 2.044e+04 (9.722e-05) d life span Baird2000
Lb 0.02 0.01396 (0.3022) cm shell length at birth unio
Lj 0.03 0.01396 (0.5348) cm shell length at settlement unio
Lp 6 5.95 (0.008352) cm shell length at puberty Baird2000
Li 18 18 (6.622e-05) cm ultimate shell length Baird2000

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
LN shell length fecundity (0.1859) Baird2000
LWw shell length total weight (0.08714) Baird2000
tL time shell length (0.145) Baird2000

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Cumberlandia monodonta Unit Description
v 0.02 0.002821 cm/d energy conductance
kap 0.8 0.9861 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency
p_M 18 22.31 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
kap_G 0.8 0.8014 - growth efficiency

Discussion

  • Males are assumed not to differ from females
  • Energy conductance is very low, but attemps to increase it affected goodness of fit

Facts

  • no hermaphrodism found (Ref: Baird2000)

Bibliography

Citation