Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MB migrate: Mo phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.3 ecozone: MPSW, MI food: bjPz, jiCi class:
MRE = 0.072 habitat: 0jMp, jiMcd gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.031 embryo: Mp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 2.9 2.881 (0.006491) d age at birth guess
am 2190 2183 (0.003122) d life span fishbase
Lp 21.2 20.78 (0.01979) cm total length at puberty Raja1992
Lpm 19.5 19.83 (0.01669) cm total length at puberty for males Raja1992
Li 40 41.5 (0.0374) cm ultimate total length fishbase
Wwb 9.2e-05 8.901e-05 (0.03245) g wet weight at birth Raja1992
Wwp 47 42.64 (0.09281) g wet weight at puberty fishbase
Wwi 329 339.5 (0.03196) g ultimate female wet weight fishbase

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
LW_f Data for females, males total length weight (0.1339) Raja1992
LW_m Data for females, males total length weight (0.1058) Raja1992
LN total length fecundity (0.39) Raja1992
tL_fm time since birth total length (0.02548) Raja1992

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Cynoglossus arel Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02343 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 33.54 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.3107 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.9884 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.803 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} and E_Hp only

Facts

  • Length-Weight relationship: W in g = 0.00398*(TL in cm)^3.07 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation