Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MB migrate: Mo phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.3 ecozone: MPSW, MI food: bjPz, jiCi class:
MRE = 0.064 habitat: 0jMp, jiMcd gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.018 embryo: Mp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 2 1.945 (0.02771) d age at birth guess
am 2190 2188 (0.0009683) d life span fishbase
Lp 16 15.77 (0.01464) cm total length at puberty Raja1992
Lpm 15.8 15.98 (0.01171) cm total length at puberty for males Raja1992
Li 21.3 22.53 (0.05787) cm ultimate total length Raja1992
Wwb 3.35e-05 3.294e-05 (0.01658) g wet weight at birth Raja1992
Wwp 22 21.66 (0.0156) g wet weight at puberty guess
Wwi 65 63.22 (0.02733) g ultimate female wet weight Raja1992

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
LW_f Data for females, males total length weight (0.1085) Raja1992
LW_m Data for females, males total length weight (0.1017) Raja1992
LN total length fecundity (0.3556) Raja1992
tL_fm time since birth total length (0.03951) Raja1992

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Cynoglossus lida Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02343 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 49.9 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.2096 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.9906 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.7999 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} and E_Hp only

Facts

  • Length-Weight relationship: W in g = 0.00389*(TL in cm)^3.07 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation