Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MB, MC migrate: Mo phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.6 ecozone: MAW food: bjPz, jiCi class:
MRE = 0.049 habitat: 0jMp, 0jMd gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.005 embryo: Mp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 1.7 6.642 (2.907) d age at birth fishbase
am 6570 6523 (0.00712) d life span guess
Lp 17.9 17.57 (0.01868) cm total length at puberty fishbase
Li 98 101.1 (0.03208) cm ultimate total length fishbase
Wwb 0.0002 0.0001964 (0.01819) g wet weight at birth guess
Wwi 9400 9866 (0.0496) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Ri 4658 4601 (0.01219) #/d reprod rate fishbase

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
LW_f Data for females, males total length weight (0.09624) LoweChit1995
LW_m Data for females, males total length weight (0.08269) LoweChit1995
tL time since birth total length (0.06494) LoweChit1995

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Cynoscion regalis Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02533 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 26.77 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.3891 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.9355 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8034 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} and E_Hp only
  • ab is ignored, the value probably relates to hatch

Facts

  • Length-Weight relationship: W in g = 0.00759*(TL in cm)^3.06 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation