Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: Am, BSk migrate: Ma phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: TP, TH, TN food: biCi class:
MRE = 0.100 habitat: 0iFl, 0iFr gender: Dg order:
SMSE = 0.026 embryo: Fbf reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
am 2555 2515 (0.01566) d life span fishbase
Lp 12.8 12.31 (0.03804) cm total length at puberty SchiFial1998
Li 26.3 25.46 (0.03205) cm ultimate total length for females fishbase
Wwb 0.00052 0.0005187 (0.002423) g wet weight at birth guess
Wwp 34.4 35.13 (0.02131) g wet weight at puberty fishbase, SchiFial1998
Wwi 309.5 310.5 (0.003193) g ultimate wet weight fishbase

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_f Data for females, males time total length (0.1788) HartBarb1993
tL_m Data for females, males time total length (0.01993) HartBarb1993
LW_f total length weight (0.08898) HartBarb1993
LW_m total length weight (0.06663) HartBarb1993
LN total length fecundity (0.2795) SchiFial1998

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Cyphocharax voga Unit Description
v 0.02 0.01726 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 17.48 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.5985 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.7932 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.7999 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} only
  • 1.9 yr had to be added to tL data to arrive at a natural fit

Facts

  • length-weight: Ww in g = 0.01445*(TL in cm)^3.05 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation