Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MB migrate: Mo phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.3 ecozone: MAE, MAm food: bjPz, jiCi class:
MRE = 0.053 habitat: 0jMp, jiMcd gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.004 embryo: Mp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
am 2920 2907 (0.004391) d life span CabrCata2003
Lp 27.5 24.97 (0.09217) cm total length at puberty guess
Li 40 43.65 (0.09134) cm ultimate total length for females fishbase
Wwb 0.00018 0.0001846 (0.0254) g wet weight at birth guess
Wwp 140 145.2 (0.03749) g wet weight at puberty guess, fishbase
Wwi 810 776.5 (0.04132) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Ri 821.9 841.1 (0.02333) #/d max reprod rate guess

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_f Data for females, males time since birth total length (0.08261) CabrCata2003
tL_m Data for females, males time since birth total length (0.08042) CabrCata2003

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Dagetichthys lusitanicus Unit Description
v 0.02 0.01894 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 11.54 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.909 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.9289 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.7975 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • Males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} and E_Hp only

Facts

  • Length-Weight relationship: Ww in g = 0.00977*(TL in cm)^3.07 (Ref: CabrCata2003)
  • Branchiostoma lanceolatum form an important component of the diet

Bibliography

Citation