Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: std climate: MA, MB migrate: Mo phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MASE, MIW food: biCi, biCvf class:
MRE = 0.016 habitat: 0iMcd gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.000 embryo: Mv reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 305 306.3 (0.004175) d age at birth Cowl1990
am 5110 5123 (0.002599) d life span Cowl1997
Lb 19 19.35 (0.01867) cm total length at birth Cowl1997
Lp 50 49.92 (0.001625) cm disc width at puberty Cowl1997
Lpm 40.8 40.75 (0.00132) cm disc width at puberty for males Cowl1997
Li 75.5 79.8 (0.05699) cm ultimate disc width Cowl1990
Lim 62.6 64.02 (0.0226) cm ultimate disc width for males Cowl1990
Wwi 1.48e+04 1.474e+04 (0.00395) g ultimate wet weight Cowl1990
Ri 0.006849 0.006868 (0.00271) #/d maximum reprod rate fishbase

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_f Data for females, males time since birth disc width (0.02002) Cowl1997
tL_m Data for females, males time since birth disc width (0.017) Cowl1997

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Dasyatis chrysonota Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02735 cm/d energy conductance
kap 0.8 0.9192 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency
p_M 18 20.83 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
kap_G 0.8 0.8003 - growth efficiency

Discussion

  • males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} and E_Hp only
  • Temperatures are guessed
  • mod_1: males have equal state variables at b, compared to females

Facts

  • length-weight: Ww in g = 1e-5*(DW in mm)^3.186 for females, 9e-6*(DW in mm)^3.2512 for males (Ref: Cowl1990)
  • ovoviviparous (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation