Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MA migrate: Mo phylum:
COMPLETE = 3.2 ecozone: MI, MPW food: bjPz, jiCi class:
MRE = 0.023 habitat: 0iMp gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.001 embryo: Mp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 4 20.6 (4.15) d age at birth LikaKooy2014
am 5475 5774 (0.05464) d life span fishbase
Lp 19 17.09 (0.1005) cm total length at puberty fishbase
Li 38.3 45.82 (0.1963) cm ultimate total length fishbase
Wwb 0.00039 0.0003996 (0.02455) g wet weight at birth LikaKooy2014
Wwp 5000 4987 (0.002617) g wet weight at puberty fishbase
Wwi 1.03e+05 9.608e+04 (0.06719) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
GSI 0.05 0.0483 (0.03405) - gonado-somatic index guess

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL time since birth total length (0.01608) InglPaul1984

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Dendrophysa russelii Unit Description
v 0.02 0.004045 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 14.49 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.0004588 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.1646 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.9458 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.805 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • males are supposed not to differ from females

Facts

  • weight-length relationship: Ww in g = 0.00813*(TL in cm)^3.10 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation