Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MB migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MAW food: bjCi, biCvf class:
MRE = 0.082 habitat: 0jMp, jiMd gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.011 embryo: Mp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
am 5110 5171 (0.01187) d life span GranAbde2006
Lp 38.8 36.27 (0.06514) cm total length at puberty fishbase
Li 87 82.58 (0.05086) cm ultimate total length fishbase
Wwb 0.00025 0.0002283 (0.08678) g wet weight at birth ChiuHo2025
Wwp 584 583.9 (0.0001715) g wet weight at puberty fishbase
Wwi 6585 6889 (0.04616) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Ri 383.9 367.9 (0.04159) #/d max reoduction rateat TL 55 cm ChiuHo2025

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_f Data for females, males time since birth total length (0.1094) GranAbde2006
tL_m Data for females, males time since birth total length (0.1061) GranAbde2006

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Diagramma pictum Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02137 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 2.624 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 3.974 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.9383 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8024 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • males are supposed to differ from females by {p_Am} only

Facts

  • weight-length relationship: W in g = 0.01000*(TL in cm)^3.00 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation