Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MB migrate: Mo phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MPW, MIE food: bjPz, jiCi, jiCvf class:
MRE = 0.068 habitat: 0jMp, jiMdb gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.017 embryo: Mb reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
am 3650 3718 (0.01864) d life span guess
Lp 27.2 27.19 (0.000377) cm total length at puberty ChaKang2010
Li 40 38.15 (0.04635) cm ultimate total length fishbase
Wwb 0.00022 0.0002118 (0.03707) g wet weight at birth ChaKang2010
Wwi 1000 1013 (0.01329) g ultimate wet weight ChaKang2010

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
LN total length fecundity (0.2757) ChaKang2010
WN weight fecundity (0.2747) ChaKang2010
tL1_fm time since birth total length (0.02404) KhanChoi2012
tL_fm time since birth total length (0.0385) ChoiChoi2012

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Doederleinia berycoides Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02633 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 163.5 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.06375 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.8949 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8028 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • Males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} only
  • black innerside of mouth suggests that this species is a mouth brooder, but this is very speculative

Facts

  • length-weight: Ww in g = 0.01148*(TL in cm)^2.98 (Ref: fishbase)
  • The family lanternbellies has light-emitting organs at the underside (Ref: Wiki)

Bibliography

Citation