Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MB migrate: Mo phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MPW, MIE food: bjPz, jiCi, jiCvf class:
MRE = 0.070 habitat: 0jMp, jiMdb gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.017 embryo: Mb reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
am 3650 3650 (1.32e-05) d life span guess
Lp 27.2 26.99 (0.007599) cm total length at puberty ChaKang2010
Li 40 38.17 (0.04576) cm ultimate total length fishbase
Wwb 0.00022 0.0002131 (0.03128) g wet weight at birth ChaKang2010
Wwi 1000 1011 (0.01075) g ultimate wet weight ChaKang2010

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
LN total length fecundity (0.2758) ChaKang2010
WN weight fecundity (0.2758) ChaKang2010
tL1_fm time since birth total length (0.03678) KhanChoi2012
tL_fm time since birth total length (0.04099) ChoiChoi2012

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Doederleinia berycoides Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02633 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 164.4 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.06348 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.894 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8021 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency
s_s 0.01 0.01029 - supply stress

Discussion

  • Males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} only
  • black innerside of mouth suggests that this species is a mouth brooder, but this is very speculative

Facts

  • length-weight: Ww in g = 0.01148*(TL in cm)^2.98 (Ref: fishbase)
  • The family lanternbellies has light-emitting organs at the underside (Ref: Wiki)

Bibliography

Citation