Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: ssj climate: MC, MB migrate: Ma phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.0 ecozone: MAW, MAg, THn food: bpCi, piCvf class:
MRE = 0.030 habitat: 0iMr, 0iMcp, piFe, piFr gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.003 embryo: Mp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 2.5 2.762 (0.1046) d age at birth ADW
am 2.008e+04 2.008e+04 (2.862e-05) d life span AnAge
Ls 2.8 2.8 (7.438e-05) cm standard length at metamorphosis to stage 2 flmnh
Lp 52 52.62 (0.01189) cm total length at birth SantArbo1993
Li 100 100.6 (0.006211) cm ultimate total length fishbase
Wwb 0.000523 0.0005059 (0.03278) g wet weight at birth guess
Wwp 783 779.7 (0.004187) g wet weight at puberty SantArbo1993, fishbase
Wwi 5500 5453 (0.008625) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Ri 1423 1424 (0.0008976) #/d reprod rate at TL 95 cm SantArbo1993
dLb 0.07983 0.08554 (0.07148) cm/d change in TL at birth Leve2014

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
LWw total length wet weight (0.09013) SantArbo1993

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Elops saurus Unit Description
v 0.02 0.05498 cm/d energy conductance
kap 0.8 0.9901 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency
p_M 18 14.72 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
kap_G 0.8 0.7989 - growth efficiency

Discussion

  • males are assumed not to differ from females (lack of data)
  • All larval forms are given the same shape coefficient, del_M, due to lack of data

Facts

  • length-weight: Ww in g = 0.00603*(TL in cm)^2.98 (Ref: fishbase)
  • length-length from photo: SL = 0.8355 * TL (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation