Predictions & Data for this entry
| Model: std | climate: Aw, BSh | migrate: | phylum: |
| COMPLETE = 2.5 | ecozone: TA | food: biCi | class: |
| MRE = 0.072 | habitat: 0bTd, biFr, biFl | gender: Dg | order: |
| SMSE = 0.012 | embryo: Tt | reprod: O | family: |
Zero-variate data
| Data | Observed | Predicted | (RE) | Unit | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ab | 80 | 70.48 | (0.119) | d | age at birth | GaikClar2011 |
| tp | 1460 | 1444 | (0.01099) | d | time since birth at puberty for female | GaikClar2011 |
| tpm | 730 | 731 | (0.001429) | d | time since birth at puberty for male | GaikClar2011 |
| am | 7300 | 7310 | (0.001382) | d | life span | guess |
| Wwb | 6.5 | 6.73 | (0.03533) | g | wet weight at birth | GaikClar2011 |
| Wwi | 1900 | 1886 | (0.007205) | g | ultimate wet weight for female | GaikClar2011, Jone2003 |
| Wwim | 1200 | 1202 | (0.002071) | g | ultimate wet weight for male | GaikClar2011, Jone2003 |
| Ri | 0.05342 | 0.05285 | (0.01085) | #/d | maximum reprod rate | GaikClar2011 |
Uni- and bivariate data
| Data | Figure | Independent variable | Dependent variable | (RE) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| tW_f |   | time | weight | (0.07808) | GaikClar2011 |
| tW_m | | time | weight | (0.1433) | GaikClar2011 |
Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C
| Data | Generalised animal | Emydura victoriae | Unit | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| v | 0.02 | 0.02351 | cm/d | energy conductance |
| kap | 0.8 | 0.881 | - | allocation fraction to soma |
| kap_R | 0.95 | 0.95 | - | reproduction efficiency |
| p_M | 18 | 121 | J/d.cm^3 | vol-spec som maint |
| k_J | 0.002 | 0.002 | 1/d | maturity maint rate coefficient |
| kap_G | 0.8 | 0.8009 | - | growth efficiency |
Discussion
- Males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} and E_Hp only
- The growth curves suggest a much lower ultimate weight, compared to field data
- mod_1: males have equal state variables at b, compared to females
Bibliography