Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MA migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MI, MPW food: bjPz, jiCi class:
MRE = 0.056 habitat: 0jMp, jiMr gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.009 embryo: Mp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
am 5475 5487 (0.002193) d life span guess
Lp 41.3 40.77 (0.0128) cm fork length at puberty for females guess
Li 90 89.46 (0.005957) cm ultimate std length for females fishbase
Wwb 0.00032 0.0003204 (0.001241) g wet weight at birth guess
Wwp 1038 1042 (0.003625) g wet weight at puberty guess, fishbase
Wwi 1.1e+04 1.101e+04 (0.0008614) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Ri 4658 4653 (0.001045) #/d max reoduction rate guess

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL time since birth std length (0.1297) FryBrew2006

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Epinephelus morrhua Unit Description
v 0.02 0.01642 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 14.25 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.0008106 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.2978 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.9151 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.7992 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • males are assumed not to differ from females

Facts

  • weight-length relationship: W in g = 0.01318*(TL in cm)^3.03 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation