Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: Cfa, Dfa, Dfb migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.6 ecozone: THn food: biCi class:
MRE = 0.038 habitat: 0iFc gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.004 embryo: Fnm reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
am 1460 1475 (0.01004) d life span Karr1964
Lp 3 3.003 (0.0009867) cm std length at puberty Karr1964
Li 8.4 8.511 (0.01325) cm ultimate total length fishbase
Wwb 0.0009 0.0008996 (0.0004269) g wet weight at birth guess
Ri 1.605 1.602 (0.002114) #/d max reproduction rate Karr1964

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_f Data for females, males time since birth total length (0.03602) Karr1964
tL_m Data for females, males time since birth total length (0.04754) Karr1964
tWw_f time since birth wet weight (0.1339) Karr1964
tWw_m time since birth wet weight (0.1397) Karr1964

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Etheostoma flabellare Unit Description
v 0.02 0.0228 cm/d energy conductance
kap 0.8 0.9449 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency
p_M 18 29.88 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
kap_G 0.8 0.8015 - growth efficiency

Discussion

  • Males are assumed to differ from females by E_Hp only
  • mod_1: males have equal state variables at b, compared to females

Facts

  • length-weight: log10(Ww in g) = -2.730 + 2.835 *log10(TL in mm); but this must be wrong (Ref: Karr1964)
  • length-length: SL = 0.84 * TL (Ref: Karr1964)

Bibliography

Citation