Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: std climate: Am migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.6 ecozone: TH, TN, TA, TPi food: biPp, biD class:
MRE = 0.045 habitat: 0iFp, 0iFl, 0iFm gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.005 embryo: Fbf reprod: Apf family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 5 4.669 (0.06623) d age at birth guess
Lb 0.074 0.07242 (0.02134) cm total length at birth Smir1962
Lp 0.18 0.3282 (0.8236) cm total length at puberty Smir1962
Li 0.4 0.3998 (0.0004779) cm ultimate total length nina
Lim 0.14 0.1402 (0.001707) cm ultimate total length for males nina
Ri 1.111 1.114 (0.002263) #/d max reprod rate Bott1975

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL1 Data forhigh, low food time since birth length (0.04961) Smir1962
tL2 Data forhigh, low food time since birth length (0.08408) Smir1962
LWw length weight (0.15) Smir1962
Tam temperature mean life span (0.03965) Bott1975
Ttp temperature time since birth at puberty (0.1017) Bott1975
tL time since birth length (0.04936) KlemAase2020

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Eurycercus lamellatus Unit Description
v 0.02 0.03711 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 1695 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.005246 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.8983 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.7999 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} only

Bibliography

Citation