Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MA migrate: Mo phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MPW food: biCi, jiHa class:
MRE = 0.069 habitat: 0iMp, jiMr gender: Hsm order:
SMSE = 0.009 embryo: Mp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 5 4.869 (0.02624) d age at birth guess
am 6205 6205 (5.835e-05) d life span guess
Lp 11.7 12.66 (0.08167) cm total length at puberty fishbase
Li 40 43.58 (0.08953) cm ultimate total length fishbase
Wwb 0.00032 0.0003204 (0.001392) g wet weight at birth fishbase
Wwp 31.2 30.32 (0.02815) g wet weight at puberty fishbase
Wwi 1248 1238 (0.007826) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
GSI 0.05 0.05069 (0.01387) - gonado-somatic index guess

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tdLdW_1962 time since birth change in length
change in weight
(0.1058) ZhanChen2016
tdLdW_2006 time since birth change in length
change in weight
(0.08764) ZhanChen2016

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Evynnis cardinalis Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02072 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 25.09 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.4217 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.9554 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.7909 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} only

Facts

  • weight-length relationship: Ww in g = 0.01950*(TL in cm)^3.00 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation