Predictions & Data for this entry
| Model: abj | climate: MB, MC | migrate: | phylum: |
| COMPLETE = 4.7 | ecozone: MPE | food: bjP, jiD, jiS | class: |
| MRE = 0.098 | habitat: 0bMb, bjMpe, jiMb | gender: D | order: |
| SMSE = 0.037 | embryo: Mbf | reprod: O | family: |
Zero-variate data
| Data | Observed | Predicted | (RE) | Unit | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ab | 3 | 3.152 | (0.05065) | d | age at birth | DengYe1990, LuoKong2014, LiXiang2002 |
| tp | 76 | 68.76 | (0.09532) | d | time since birth at puberty | LiXiang2002, DengYe1990 |
| am | 730 | 666.8 | (0.08656) | d | life span | Wiki |
| Lj | 0.6 | 0.1391 | (0.7681) | cm | total length at metam | DengYe1990, LiXiang2002 |
| Lp | 4 | 6.236 | (0.5591) | cm | total length at puberty | LiXiang2002 |
| Li | 23.5 | 20.56 | (0.125) | cm | ultimate total length | Wiki |
| Wwb | 1.15e-05 | 1.229e-05 | (0.06883) | g | wet weight at birth | DengYe1990 |
| Wwp | 2.7 | 2.583 | (0.04348) | g | wet weight at puberty | LuoKong2014 |
| Wwi | 91.8 | 92.57 | (0.008405) | g | ultimate wet weight | DengYe1990 |
| Ri | 4110 | 4103 | (0.001564) | #/d | maximum reprod rate | Chen2001, Fan2013 |
Uni- and bivariate data
| Data | Figure | Independent variable | Dependent variable | (RE) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| tL_f1 |   | time since birth | total length | (0.04686) | DengYe1990 |
| tL_m1 | | time since birth | total length | (0.03675) | DengYe1990 |
| tL_f2 |   | time since birth | total length | (0.02899) | ChenLiu1990 |
| tL_m2 | | time since birth | total length | (0.0383) | ChenLiu1990 |
| tL_f3 |   | time since birth | total length | (0.04274) | Zhang2001 |
| tL_m3 | | time since birth | total length | (0.04204) | Zhang2001 |
| tW_f1 |   | time since birth | wet weight | (0.1004) | DengYe1990 |
| tW_m1 | | time since birth | wet weight | (0.07907) | DengYe1990 |
| tW_f2 |   | time since birth | wet weight | (0.1126) | ChenLiu1990 |
| tW_m2 | | time since birth | wet weight | (0.0842) | ChenLiu1990 |
| tW_f3 |   | time | wet weight | (0.07943) | Zhang2001 |
| tW_m3 | | time | wet weight | (0.0708) | Zhang2001 |
| LJC20 |   | body length | specific CO_2 production rate | (0.067) | ZhangDong1998 |
| LJC25 | | body length | specific CO_2 production rate | (0.1115) | ZhangDong1998 |
| LJC30 | | body length | specific CO_2 production rate | (0.06977) | ZhangDong1998 |
| WwJX_T23 |   | wet weight | specific food intake | (0.08338) | QiaoShen1992 |
| WwJX_T26 | | wet weight | specific food intake | (0.07203) | QiaoShen1992 |
| WwJX_T30 | | wet weight | specific food intake | (0.04254) | QiaoShen1992 |
| LW |  | length | wet weight | (0.05382) | DengYe1990, ChenLiu1990, Zhang2001 |
| TJN |  | temperature | wet-mass spec NH_4 production | (0.3046) | ZhangDong1998 |
| TJO |  | temperature | wet-mass spec O_2 consumption | (0.267) | ZhangDong1998 |
| WN |  | wet weight | fecundity | (0.1089) | DengYe1990 |
| WwJX_T |  | wet weight | food intake | (0.06232) | ZhangLin1983 |
Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C
| Data | Generalised animal | Fenneropenaeus chinensis | Unit | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| v | 0.02 | 0.01915 | cm/d | energy conductance |
| p_M | 18 | 3156 | J/d.cm^3 | vol-spec som maint |
| k_J | 0.002 | 0.002 | 1/d | maturity maint rate coefficient |
| k | 0.3 | 0.00281 | - | maintenance ratio |
| kap | 0.8 | 0.9383 | - | allocation fraction to soma |
| kap_G | 0.8 | 0.8019 | - | growth efficiency |
| kap_R | 0.95 | 0.95 | - | reproduction efficiency |
Discussion
- The 3rd set of growth data was a mixture of three cohorts collected in Yellow Sea in 1971, 1984 & 1985, so less weigh is given
- There is a large range of oxygen consumption and ammonia excretion, so less weight is given
- There is a large variation of feeding rates at 23, 26 & 30oC, so less weight is given
- Males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} only
- The estimated sclaed function responses vary slighty in accordance to mean temperature, where the Bohai Sea is coolest, so the algae are probably richer in carbohydrates
- mod_1: males have equal state variables at b, compared to females
Acknowledgment
- The creation of this entry was supported by the Norwegian Science Council (NFR 255295)
Bibliography