Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MA, Aw migrate: Ma phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MIN food: biPz class:
MRE = 0.085 habitat: piMc gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.033 embryo: Mp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 7 7.04 (0.005651) d age at birth guess
am 365 365.1 (0.0002727) d life span fishbase
Lp 9.3 9.256 (0.004738) cm std length at puberty KabiHoss1998
Lpm 7.7 7.474 (0.02933) cm std length at puberty for males KabiHoss1998
Li 20 20.07 (0.003448) cm ultimate total length fishbase
Wwb 0.00052 0.0005177 (0.004419) g wet weight at birth KabiHoss1998
Wwp 14.65 14.04 (0.04182) g wet weight at puberty KabiHoss1998
Wwpm 7.41 7.421 (0.001512) g wet weight at puberty for males KabiHoss1998
Wwi 82.8 143.1 (0.7281) g ultimate wet weight fishbase

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
LN std length fecundity (0.3129) KabiHoss1998
WN weight fecundity (0.2909) KabiHoss1998
tL_fm time since birth total length (0.04208) AhmeSmit2007
tW_fm time since birth weight (0.1142) AhmeSmit2007

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Gudusia chapra Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02764 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 21.57 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.4852 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.4243 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.7995 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} and E_Hp only
  • calculated Wwi was ignored, due to inconsistency with tW data

Facts

  • length-weight: Ww in g = 0.00891*(TL in cm)^3.05 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation