Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: std	climate: Aw	migrate:	phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5	ecozone: TPi	food: biO	class:
MRE = 0.067	habitat: 0iFc, 0iTi	gender: Dtmf	order:
SMSE = 0.012	embryo: Tt	reprod: O	family:

Zero-variate data

Data	Observed	Predicted	(RE)	Unit	Description	Reference
ab	127	139	(0.09468)	d	age at birth	Goet2007
am	8358	8358	(1.207e-05)	d	life span	EoL
Lb	6.2	5.95	(0.04033)	cm	carapace length at birth	Goet2007
Lp	8.8	8.801	(8.648e-05)	cm	carapace length at puberty	Goet2007
Li	30	27.76	(0.0747)	cm	ultimate carapace length	guess
Lim	27.5	25.65	(0.06737)	cm	ultimate carapace length for males	Goet2007
Ww0	47	44.9	(0.04459)	g	initial wet weight	Goet2007
Wwb	33	36.1	(0.09403)	g	wet weight at birth	Goet2007
Wwim	2800	2825	(0.009038)	g	ultimate wet weight for males	Goet2007
Ri	0.005479	0.005484	(0.0008248)	#/d	maximum reprod rate	Goet2007

Uni- and bivariate data

Data	Figure	Independent variable	Dependent variable	(RE)	Reference
LWw_f		carapace length	wet weight	(0.1954)	Goet2007
LWw_m		carapace length	wet weight	(0.2674)	Goet2007
tWw		time since birth	wet weight	(0.1039)	Goet2007

Pseudo-data at T_ref = 20°C

Data	Generalised animal	Heosemys spinosa	Unit	Description
v	0.02	0.0358	cm/d	energy conductance
kap	0.8	0.9475	-	allocation fraction to soma
kap_R	0.95	0.95	-	reproduction efficiency
p_M	18	7.373	J/d.cm^3	vol-spec som maint
k_J	0.002	0.0002807	1/d	maturity maint rate coefficient
kap_G	0.8	0.7965	-	growth efficiency
k	0.3	0.3	-	maintenance ratio

Discussion

Males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} only
In view of low somatic maintenance, pseudodata k_J = 0.002 1/d is replaced by pseudodata k = 0.3

Bibliography

Citation