Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MA migrate: Mo phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MAW food: biPz class:
MRE = 0.070 habitat: 0iMcp gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.017 embryo: Mpe reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 2 2.03 (0.0149) d age at birth guess
ap 120 124.5 (0.0378) d age at puberty OxenHunt1994
am 547.5 546.3 (0.002216) d life span guess
Lb 0.8 0.7779 (0.02766) cm fork length at birth OxenHunt1994
Lp 20.9 18.75 (0.1029) cm fork length at puberty OxenHunt1994
Li 30 28.69 (0.04361) cm ultimate fork length fishbase
Wwi 324 322 (0.006271) g ultimate wet weight fisfbase
Ri 41.1 52.24 (0.2712) #/d maximum reprod rate CasaRoss2005

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
LN standard length fecundity (0.3364) CasaRoss2005
tL time since birth fork length (0.08625) OxenHunt1994

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Hirundichthys affinis Unit Description
v 0.02 0.1926 cm/d energy conductance
kap 0.8 0.9537 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency
p_M 18 77.73 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
kap_G 0.8 0.8 - growth efficiency

Discussion

  • Fecundity is assumed to equal that of Cheilopogon melanurus
  • shape coefficient for fork length is assumed 0.95 * that for standard length
  • Li is given more weight to assure a proper max length

Facts

  • wet weight (g) = 0.01160 * (FL in cm)^3.010 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation