Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MA migrate: Mo phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MPW, MIN food: biPz class:
MRE = 0.035 habitat: 0iMcp gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.003 embryo: Mpe reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 2 2.129 (0.06454) d age at birth guess
tp 141 141 (5.887e-06) d timce since birth at puberty guess
am 547.5 548.2 (0.001298) d life span guess
Lp 12.54 12.52 (0.001694) cm fork length at puberty guess
Li 18 18.15 (0.008123) cm ultimate fork length fishbase
Wwb 0.00018 0.0001779 (0.01153) g wet weight at birth Wiki_t
Ri 8.9 8.809 (0.01023) #/d maximum reprod rate guess

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
LWw_f Data for females, males fork length wet weight (0.08685) ChanYuan2022
LWw_m Data for females, males fork length wet weight (0.09774) ChanYuan2022
tL time since birth fork length (0.05006) ChanYuan2022

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Hirundichthys oxycephalus Unit Description
v 0.02 0.04024 cm/d energy conductance
kap 0.8 0.9987 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency
p_M 18 94.89 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
kap_G 0.8 0.8007 - growth efficiency

Discussion

  • Fecundity is assumed to equal that of Cheilopogon melanurus
  • shape coefficient for fork length is assumed 0.95 * that for standard length
  • Li is given more weight to assure a proper max length

Facts

  • Preferred temp: 24.7 - 29.3 C (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation