Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MC migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.3 ecozone: MAE, MAm, MI, MP food: bjPz, jiCi class:
MRE = 0.144 habitat: 0jMp, jiMd gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.058 embryo: Mp reprod: Os family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
am 450 502.6 (0.1169) d life span for female MereStac2011
Lp 11 11.16 (0.01411) cm mantle length at puberty for female MereStac2011
Lpm 5.5 5.581 (0.01472) cm mantle length at puberty for male MereStac2011
Li 23 21.15 (0.08064) cm mantle length at death for female MereStac2011
Lim 19.8 19.95 (0.007574) cm mantle length at death for male MereStac2011
Wwb 2.4e-05 2.38e-05 (0.008373) g wet weight at birth Lapt2001
Ni 2.75e+05 2.769e+05 (0.006962) # cum reprod at death Lapt2001

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_f Data for females, males time mantle length (0.2103) MereStac2011
tL_m Data for females, males time mantle length (0.2087) MereStac2011
tWw_f time wet weight (0.4738) MereStac2011
tWw_m time wet weight (0.4704) MereStac2011

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Histioteuthis bonnellii Unit Description
v 0.02 0.0201 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 13.33 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.8231 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.9982 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8008 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • Males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} and E_Hp only
  • Temperatures are guessed
  • mod_1: males have equal state variables at b, compared to females

Bibliography

Citation