Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MB migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MPE food: biCi class:
MRE = 0.077 habitat: 0iMc, 0iMr gender: Hsf order:
SMSE = 0.016 embryo: Mnm reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 8 7.142 (0.1073) d age at birth guess
am 2.08e+04 2.08e+04 (0.0003815) d life span fishbase
Lp 17 15.28 (0.1011) cm standard length at puberty guess
Li 35.6 31.33 (0.1199) cm ultimate standard length fishbase
Wwb 9.1e-05 9.145e-05 (0.004985) g wet weight at birth guess
Wwp 112.3 116.3 (0.03589) g wet weight at puberty fishbase, guess
Wwi 965.5 1003 (0.03839) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Ri 411 412.3 (0.003304) #/d maximum reprod rate fishbase

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
LW total length weight (0.2364) FernReye2016
tL time since birth total length (0.09202) FernReye2016

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Holacanthus passer Unit Description
v 0.02 0.01972 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 5.932 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.0003384 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.299 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.9797 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.7981 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • males are supposed to differ from females by {p_Am} only

Facts

  • length-weight: Ww in g = 0.02951*(TL in cm)^2.91 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation