Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: std climate: B, Cfa, Dfa, BSk migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: THn food: biCi class:
MRE = 0.067 habitat: 0iTg, 0iTh, 0iTd gender: Dg order:
SMSE = 0.008 embryo: Tt reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 62 53.77 (0.1328) d age at birth guess
am 2325 2333 (0.003574) d life span JoneBall1987
Lb 2.45 2.351 (0.04023) cm SVL at birth JoneBall1987
Lp 4.1 4.077 (0.005547) cm SVL at puberty JoneBall1987
Li 5.7 6.281 (0.102) cm ultimate SVL JoneBall1987
Wwb 0.35 0.3827 (0.09354) g wet weight at birth JoneBall1987
Ri 0.0274 0.02756 (0.005876) #/d maximum reprod rate JoneBall1987

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
LW_f Data for females, males SVL weight (0.08565) Genn1974
LW_m Data for females, males SVL weight (0.08021) Genn1974
tL_fm time since birth SVL (0.07178) JoneBall1987

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Holbrookia maculata Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02359 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 374.3 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.04206 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.9043 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.7973 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency
s_s 0.01 0.003675 - supply stress

Discussion

  • T is assumed to vary as T(t) = 11+25*sin(2*pi*(t+100)/365) in C
  • Males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} only
  • mod_1: v increased to reduce [p_M]

Bibliography

Citation