Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: std climate: Cfa, Dfa migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: TPa food: biCi, biCvf class:
MRE = 0.217 habitat: biMm gender: Dtmf order:
SMSE = 0.148 embryo: Tt reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 110 112.5 (0.02285) d age at birth Wiki
tp 1278 1369 (0.07129) d time since birth at puberty Loeh2004
am 1.095e+04 1.095e+04 (0.0002627) d life span guess
Lb 3 3.407 (0.1358) cm carapace length at birth Wiki
Lp 8.4 6.911 (0.1772) cm carapace length at puberty Loeh2004
Li 11 11.37 (0.03325) cm ultimate carapace length Loeh2004
Lim 8.95 8.926 (0.002656) cm ultimate carapace length for males Loeh2004
Wwb 7 6.748 (0.03606) g wet weight at birth Wiki
Wwi 241 250.4 (0.03919) g ultimate wet weight Loeh2004
Wwim 113 113 (0.0001592) g ultimate wet weight for males Loeh2004
Ri 0.01096 0.01089 (0.006049) #/d maximum reprod rate guess

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
LdL carapace length change in carapace length (0.8364) Loeh2004

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Homopus signatus Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02205 cm/d energy conductance
kap 0.8 0.696 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency
p_M 18 8.935 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.0003395 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
kap_G 0.8 0.7985 - growth efficiency
k 0.3 0.2986 - maintenance ratio

Discussion

  • Males are supposed to differ from females by {p_Am} only
  • In view of low somatic maintenance, pseudodata k_J = 0.002 1/d is replaced by pseudodata k = 0.3

Facts

  • At low temperatures males hatch, else females females (Ref: Loeh2004)

Bibliography

Citation