Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: stf climate: Cfb, Dfb migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: TH food: biP, biAa class:
MRE = 0.068 habitat: 0iFp, biFl gender: Hh order:
SMSE = 0.013 embryo: Fc reprod: Ob family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 1.5 1.533 (0.02194) d age at birth MassRoch2008
tp 7 7.063 (0.009049) d time since birth at puberty MassRoch2008
am 2e+04 1.953e+04 (0.02336) d life span guess
Vb 0.02 0.01938 (0.03105) mm^3 volume at birth MassRoch2008
Vp 0.14 0.139 (0.007351) mm^3 volume at puberty MassRoch2008
Vi 1.12 1.171 (0.04513) mm^3 ultimate volume MassRoch2008
Ri 3.333 3.179 (0.0463) #/d maximum reprod rate Kali2011

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
AN surface area number of buds (0.332) Kali2011
tAs time since birth surface area (0.07692) MassRoch2008
tVs time since birth volume (0.08642) MassRoch2008

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Hydra viridissima Unit Description
v 0.02 0.04227 cm/d energy conductance
kap 0.8 0.5926 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency
p_M 18 125.7 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
kap_G 0.8 0.8008 - growth efficiency

Discussion

  • Aging at individual level hardly occurs, since cell differentiation is reversible
  • A new bud is formed as soon as the earlier one steps off
  • Bud is treated similar to foetus
  • Reproduction efficiency kap_R has been set to 0.95/2 because the species is simultaneous hermaphroditic

Facts

  • Medusa stage is absent in Hydra; this species is symbiontic with algae (Ref: Wiki)

Bibliography

Citation