Predictions & Data for this entry
| Model: stx | climate: A, Cwa, Cwb | migrate: | phylum: |
| COMPLETE = 2.5 | ecozone: TPa | food: bxM, xiCvf | class: |
| MRE = 0.091 | habitat: 0iFl, 0iFr | gender: Dg | order: |
| SMSE = 0.049 | embryo: Tv | reprod: O | family: |
Zero-variate data
| Data | Observed | Predicted | (RE) | Unit | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| tg | 61 | 60.88 | (0.001912) | d | gestation time | AnAge |
| tx | 122 | 122 | (0.0001973) | d | time since birth at weaning | guess |
| tp | 530 | 168.5 | (0.682) | d | time since birth at puberty | ADW |
| am | 8358 | 8993 | (0.07595) | d | life span | AnAge |
| Wwb | 93.5 | 93.91 | (0.004411) | g | wet weight at birth | AnAge |
| Wwi | 4700 | 5810 | (0.2361) | g | ultimate wet weight for females | Wiki |
| Wwim | 5700 | 5702 | (0.0003903) | g | ultimate wet weight for males | Wiki |
| Ri | 0.005479 | 0.005536 | (0.01025) | #/d | maximum reprod rate | AnAge |
Uni- and bivariate data
| Data | Figure | Independent variable | Dependent variable | (RE) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| tWw |  | time since birth | wet weight | (0.09621) | ReedLomb2009 |
Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C
| Data | Generalised animal | Hydrictis maculicollis | Unit | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| v | 0.02 | 0.04872 | cm/d | energy conductance |
| kap | 0.8 | 0.9956 | - | allocation fraction to soma |
| kap_R | 0.95 | 0.97 | - | reproduction efficiency |
| p_M | 18 | 4597 | J/d.cm^3 | vol-spec som maint |
| k_J | 0.002 | 0.002 | 1/d | maturity maint rate coefficient |
| kap_G | 0.8 | 0.8 | - | growth efficiency |
| t_0 | 0 | 46.85 | d | time at start development |
Discussion
- Males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} only
- The poor fit is due to tp, which is too large to be captured by the stx model
Bibliography