Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: std climate: Cfb migrate: TT phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: THp food: biCi class:
MRE = 0.205 habitat: 0jFc, jiTf gender: Dg order:
SMSE = 0.116 embryo: Fc reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 24.5 26.06 (0.06375) d age at birth amphibiaweb
tp 1825 1834 (0.004922) d time since birth at puberty Kusa1982
am 8833 8822 (0.001238) d life span AnAge
Lb 1 0.9757 (0.02429) cm SVL at birth Kusa1981
Lj 1.8 1.494 (0.1698) cm SVL at metam Kusa1981
Lp 5.5 5.362 (0.02515) cm SVL at puberty for males Kusa1982
Lpm 5 4.995 (0.001069) cm SVL at puberty for males Kusa1982
Li 7.8 9.198 (0.1792) cm ultimate SVL Kusa1982
Wwi 5 4.911 (0.01786) g ultimate wet weight guess, amphibiaweb

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
LdL_f Data for females, males SVL change in SVL (1.075) Kusa1982
LdL_m Data for females, males SVL change in SVL (0.7627) Kusa1982
LN SVL number of eggs (0.1469) Kusa1982
Ttj temperature time since birth at metam (0.1946) Kusa1981

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Hynobius nebulosus Unit Description
v 0.02 0.05264 cm/d energy conductance
kap 0.8 0.5472 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency
p_M 18 13.81 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.0005462 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
kap_G 0.8 0.7988 - growth efficiency
k 0.3 0.2901 - maintenance ratio

Discussion

  • Males are assumed to differ from females by E_Hp only
  • In view of low somatic maintenance, pseudodata k_J = 0.002 1/d is replaced by pseudodata k = 0.3

Bibliography

Citation